'
ROARND FOR CORRECTION OF IN
Oi &S, COURTING ULSE HOA —
n reference
naval peaama pursuant to the provis
to your applica
ions
section 1552.
United States Code,
4
Tm AL AVM
a
AVAL RECORDS
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HD
Docket No: NR11436-14
bf ae Neramher 204
tion for correction of your
of title 10 of the
BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
= of
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 11 December 2014 Your
injustice were reviewed in accordance
regulations and procedures applicable t
rd. Documentary material side1
of your application,
SUPPOSt therec
i el 1ons and eee In
Lous conside
t viden
rec rd
the Board found tha
insufficient to establish t
error or injustic
concurred with the comments contain
except to note 12 f your applica
not 2 July 2014. Since the Board found
e O
tg
Efile the repl
ion
1
QgQ 21
AA
considered your
allegations of error and
with administrative
o the proceed this
he Board consisted
submitted in
ings of
ration of
ce submitted was
of probable mat
, the Board substantia
n the report of the PERB
]
tion was 22 July 2014,
insufficient basis to
your record, it found the
6 _ In view of the
votes of
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important Lo keep iu hind Lhal a presutiplion of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01792-06
In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Man e Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error o...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05607-08
DEPARTMENT BOARD FOR CORRECTION 2 NAVY A WASHINGTON DC This is in reference the applicati mMaval record pursuant to the provi | | IA three-member panel of the Board Records, sitting in executive/ sess application on 24 November 2008. injustice were reviewed in ac¢orda regulations and procedures applica Board. Documentary material ¢onsi regulations and policies. your ¥ 1 t After careful and conscientious c record, the Board found that the insufficient to establish the exi error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8666 13
The Board also considered your letters dated 30 July and 15 November 2014, each with enclosures. which after careful and conscientious consideration of the entir the Board found that the evidence submitted was insuff3 establish the existence of probable material error or in this connection, the Board substantially concurre opinion dated 20 August 2014. accordingly: your application has peen denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR568 14_Redacted
Although your appli cation was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of jus t ice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your ~pplication on its merits _ A three - member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in execut ive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015 . Regarding your claim of PTSD, the Board may only consider assertion of PTSD when an applicant Rresents clear evidence that the PTSD is service connected...
AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00126
GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeto(honorable)(general)(and)(tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge),(and)(tochangethereenlistmentcode).TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0080 14
COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROOO8O-14 7 July 2014 in reference to your recent Application for Correction A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10862-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Mann Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 20 No mber 2006, a copy of which is attached. In this conction, the Board substantially concurred with the comments cont ned in the report of the PERB, except it...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10564-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Recorda, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 6, 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman petition.
AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00456
GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withcounsel,viavideoteleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMaryland andTravisAFB, CAonSeptember25,2014. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinent data onthe applicantandthefactorsleading tothe discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR683 14_Redacted
three-member panel of che Board :or Correcc~on of Nava: Records, sitting in executive session, considered your applicacion on 22 January 2015 . warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct and request for discharge . Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it now .